Sunday, April 6, 2014

Saturday Summary: Week 4

It's actually Sunday night here in Australia, as I was visiting my parents over the weekend and did not bring my laptop or my study notes. So sorry if that inconveniences anyone. Here is a summary of my fourth week of classes!

Fiction Writing: Story, Structure, and Starting Out
Readings: Point of view and voice: 'where I'm calling from' by Jack Hodgins, If on a winter's night a traveler by I Calvino, Girl by Jamacia Kincaid, Man-man by VS Naipaul, True history of the Kelly gang by Peter Carey, White Noise by D DeLillo, and Cold snap by Cate Kennedy. 

My classes really like talking about point of view. In my fiction class in particular, we were asked to consider how different points of view limit or enhance a story. When you read or writing something, do you ever sit back and think, would this work better in a different point of view? Personally, I was to rewrite my first novel EVERGREEN in first person, as I think it would do better that way than the way it is currently in third person, though third person is my preference. This is something I love about drafting and redrafting a piece of work: just because you started in a certain point of view doesn't mean you're committed to it. When you're redrafting something, you have the perfect opportunity to go back and change things like the point of view you're using. One thing that was said during class discussion resonated with me a bit and I had one of those pleasantly surprised 'huh' moments: third person is just an 'I' that never steps out from behind a chosen mask. This can work with both limited third person, where the 'I'-mask is the character the narration is focused around, and in omniscient third person, where the 'I'-mask would be a god-like voice. 

Here, I want to make a note on the distinction between two different things people mean when they say 'point of view'. There is point of view as in narration style (first person, third person, etc, as I have been talking about above and last week) and there is point of view as in focalisation, or the lens or character through which the story is told. 

Poetry: Making it Strange
Readings: Project Papers edited transcript of Ted Berrigan's Sonnet Workshop, The Sonnets: I by Ted Berrigan, The Sonnets: III by Ted Berrigan, Sonnet 1 by William Shakespeare. 

This was an interesting class. The roll-call question was What would your gnome name be? We spent a good hour talking about gnomes. We wrote poems about gnomes. Somehow, talking about gnomes led to talking about sonnets. The form of sonnets, like many other forms of art, has been changed and adapted over time. Petrarch wrote them in two stanzas, of eight lines and then six lines. When later Shakespeare got a hold of the art form, he reformatted it to four stanzas: four lines in the first three stanzas and two lines in the final stanza. Sonnets are all about the pronouns - the 'you' and the 'I' and the 'we' and the 'they' - and the abstract phrases that describe the dynamic relationship between two things. They also, traditionally, follow the rhythm of iambic pentameter, which is using five couplings of soft and hard sounds per line. Read one of the above sonnets, or another traditionally formatted sonnet, and see how each line reads approximately soft/hard soft/hard soft/hard soft/hard soft/hard like a heartbeat. 

We ended the class with a brief discussion of dada art, we can be defined as anti-art, pranks against art, or conceptual art, depending on your stance on the matter (or the artistic merrit of the individual piece, if you're like me). Basically, you find something, take it out of its original context and put it into a new context and call it art. 

Literature For Children and Young Adults
Reading: Into the Forest by Anthony Browne

This week we were looking at the postmodern fairytale picture book. Having picture story books isn't important to help kids understand what they're reading. The visual representations of the words on the page are rarely limited to their literal meaning, and children are learning to understand image representation and analysis. There can also be a cultural impact on the illustrations. Picture books are transmedia texts, which use more than one medium. In class we analyse how the words and pictures affect each others meaning and the reader's interpretation. We can analyse picture story books with a rage of tools, including the spread (pages), protagonist, frame and layout, colour, shape and lines, style and medium, and composition.

We use postmodern techniques to retell fairy tales because we have to reassess the values of the original story for a modern audience. Sometimes, this also means we have to modify the meaning of the story. One of the postmodern techniques often used is intertextuality: when the text refers to other texts and the reference plus the relationship between the two texts add meaning to the new text. Parody is another technique, which can include intertextuality. The Shrek movies are a great example of both parody and intertextuality. Another technique sometimes used is metafiction, where the text openly comments on its own fictional status and/or the character are aware that they are not real. 

Postmodern texts draw attention to how stories are created and told, how narrative fictions are constructed out of other texts, how stories encode and transmit cultural values, assumptions and ideologies, and the relationship between fiction and reality. 

Creative Nonfiction: The Personal Essay
Readings: Taking Shape by S Perl and M Schwartz, Joe Cinque's consolation: a true story of death, grief and the law by H Garner, and Subterranean Gothic by P Theroux. 

We were talking about narrative structure this week. There are a few different ways in which we can order the stories we tell. This includes forms such as chronological, segmented, framed, compare and construct, multiple perspectives, episodic, Q&A, epistolary, multigenre, and inverted pyramid. 

Every story needs a shape, and often that shape isn't clear when we start out writing our first draft. Sometimes it doesn't start to form at all until we are at the stage of redrafting. That is another thing I find beautiful about writing and drafting and redrafting; the shape, or lack thereof, is something you can go back and change. Other times, the structure of the piece you want to write will precede the story and content itself. If you are having trouble finding a shape after you have completed a first draft, some of the things you can do is go through and star your favourite parts and see if you can find a connection between them, look for the narrative arc of the overall piece, and look beyond that first line in case there is a better place for you to start. Something creative nonfiction pieces need is scene, summary and reflection. Checking to see if you tick all these boxes can also help you find the shape. Avoid second-hand telling, ground your writing in the particulars, don't be superfluous,  bring something new to the story. Don't be afraid to go on riffs and tangent as long as you bring it back to the point of the story (and don't part from the main story for so long that the reader forgets). 

Alright my petals, my Sunday-night brain is kicking in after a long weekend of doing-too-much-but-not-really-all-that-much. Visiting the hometown just zaps the energy from me and my assignments and the deadline for submissions to the next edition of Wordly Magazine (of which I am now a member of the production team) are looming. I am going to go and cram some readings for tomorrow mornings classes and then try to be in bed before midnight. 

Have you learned anything writerly this week that you would like to share? 
- Bonnee. 


  1. Yeah, the first time I wrote a (clean teen) romance short story in 3rd-person I really questioned it because all the romance I'd written in the past was in 1st-person, but I think it went okay. I haven't sold it, but it's only received one rejection and there are very few markets that'll buy a story such as it so far as I can gather. Unless I tried to make it more literary...Hmm...

    1. I don't think there's ever going to be a definite right or wrong point of view to use in a particular genre, I believe it all comes down to what works with the individual piece. You could play around and see if making it more literary works better. :) Thanks for visiting, Patrick.

  2. Thanks for the summary of week four and please don't pressure yourself. You can do the summary a few days later and we'll all apprecaite it. The topic of ffiction writing is important. We ahve to decide if to write in first or third person (writing in seciond person is very difficult to do) and if to write in the present or past (again, writing in future will be difficult to do. My first and third novel are wriiten in third person point of view and in the present. My second novel is written in first person and in the present. From what I understand the current trend in YA fiction is to write in first person. I'm not sure if it's crucial to the novel, but it's an important decision to make whehn writing a novel. The voice is another issue. I know that my novels don't have "unique voice" but now sure how to make one. Almost all literary agents say that they are looking for the Voice, but nobody is sure what it is really or how to do it. One of the mysteries of writing ..:). I saw last week the movie DIVERGENT where the city of Chicgao is enclosed by a fence. Maybe you wish to view it because in WALLS the city is also enclosed. You storyline is very different, but maybe it will be interesting to watch the movie. I looked a little at Dada Art because it was popular in Germany, while doing research for my German YA fiction but didn't understand it well. Big concepts in your Chilkdren and YA fiction class: Intertexuality and metafiction. Not easy to capture on first read. Will need to read a few times. Hoepfully you got a good sleep and have a safe trip back to the university and productive week in studying and working for the Magazine.

    1. Writing these blog posts counts as studying as far as I'm concerned! :)

      I usually just see what I automatically write each story with, and if I decide I don't like it I will go back and change it later. The current trend for YA does seem to be first person, but we discussed in class that point of view preferences happen in trends and cycles. Having said that, nothing wrong with going with the trend as long as it works with your novel. I tend to prefer writing in third person.

      I've been meaning to read the Divergent books for a while now. I didn't realise the movie had been released (or maybe it isn't in Australia just yet). I will try to check it out at some point. Thanks for telling me about it, I didn't realise it was about a fenced-off city :)

      I can no longer read a text or watch a movie without analysing it, but intertextuality and metafiction are probably things that can stick out. Thanks for visiting, Giora :) Have a nice day!

  3. Hmmm.. there's no option to edit my post and corrent the many spelling errors ..:) Oh well. just ignore them.

  4. 'Petals'? What an interesting word choice. I like it!

    By the way, have you ever read Shrek? It's quite amazing how they took off from such simple source material.

    1. Ha, I know so many people who use that word in that context :)

      And yes, I have read Shrek, just after the movie came out when I was a kid, I loved it! Thanks for visiting :)

    2. An Aussie thing, perhaps?

      Regarding the first/third switching, I think you do have to be careful when executing a switch like that. I think some types of deep or close or whatever you call it third would allow you to pretty much switch to 'I', but not all.


Have your say.

Google+ Followers

Follow by Email